Landlord Technologies of Gentrification: Facial Recognition and Building Access Technologies in New York City Homes

By Erin McElroy, Manon Vergerio, and Paula Garcia-Salazar

This report examines the increasing deployment of landlord technologies in New York City (NYC) housing, and the problems this creates and intensifies. These technologies include facial recognition, closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, and other algorithmic, biometric, and appbased building access technologies specifically designed to be deployed in tenant housing and surrounding public and private space. We map the genealogies and geographies of these surveillance systems, looking at intersections of surveillance, carcerality, and gentrification. In addition, we look at why it is that New York has become an epicenter of what the real estate industry describes as the “property technology,” or the “proptech” industry. This term encompasses the platforms, systems, algorithms, and data regimes connecting the real estate and technology industries in residential, commercial, and industrial buildings.

Section Summaries


Section 2

We explore how and why New York City emerged as a hub of landlord technology. We unearth Big Data experiments of the latter half of the 20th century, while also excavating how new technologies have been deployed by the city and by landlords in the wake of various crises, including the war on crime, the war on terror, the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis, and Hurricane Sandy. In each of these, we show, big tech mobilized through the logics of crisis capitalism to unleash largely untested technological solutionism to incite harm along familiar race, class, and gender lines, and reproduce racial capitalist geographies of property, place, and home. This, we continue to highlight, has been no less true during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Section 3

We contextualize how landlord tech automates processes of gentrification and racial dispossession. By first mapping rezoning histories and geographies in the city, we look at cartographic technologies of racial capitalism. As we note, new facial recognition landlord tech systems are often deployed along rezoning borders. They can be interpreted as strategic tools to augment property value by “catching” tenants for petty lease violations and raising rents. We look at examples in several large low-income and affordable housing complexes, such as Atlantic Plaza Towers, Taino Towers, Knickerbocker Village, and Morris Avenue Apartments. We also explore how new facial recognition systems are employed in smaller New York City buildings and lofts and how “digital doorman” companies are incubating in NYC and then expanding globally.

Section 4

We turn to the carceral effects of landlord tech surveillance. We begin by outlining the history of CCTV camera surveillance, particularly as it has been deployed in housing administered by the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA). We draw upon tenant testimonies from public hearings and press conferences to elaborate on the carceral effects of forced home surveillance, looking to stories of how landlord tech (e.g., facial recognition, algorithmic, and robotic systems) transforms the home into a prison-like space.

Section 5

We offer a policy summary of anti-surveillance legislation, looking at federal, state, and local laws that partially regulate facial recognition. We also look at several potential policies that could help regulate facial recognition in the realm of housing, or prevent petty lease violations from being used as grounds for eviction.

Section 6/7

We offer organizing tools and strategies for resisting, refusing, and thwarting the implementation of landlord tech in one’s home. Much of this draws upon the ongoing work of the Ocean Hill-Brownsville Alliance, a group that came together in Brooklyn following the success of the tenants at Atlantic Plaza Towers in preventing their landlord from deploying a biometric heat mapping facial recognition entry system. We also include instructions for how to request information from local government bodies to learn more about landlord tech in public housing, and how to scrape data from private landlord tech websites and property listing sites to better understand landlord tech geographies.


Key Report Highlights Below

Included Testimonials

  • “Cities are crowded, often dangerous places, with the gap between rich and poor growing. We need a way to live safely but also comfortably next door to one another.”

    General Farkash, former head of Israeli Military Intelligence and founder for FST21

  • “We’re in an affordable housing complex. Why do we need this expensive system? [. . .] I’ve read many news articles about the facial recognition systems and they mention how it ’s biased against people of color, against women.”

    Christina Zang, tenant and co-chair of Knickerbocker Village Tenant Association

  • “We know that the building management wants these big, beautiful apartments back so they can remarket it to ‘the new tenant.’”

    Tranae Moran, Atlantic Plaza Tower tenant

  • “With gentrification phasing out the diversity in neighborhoods, these technologies will be used as surveillance tactics to essentially speed up that process”

    Fabian Rogers, Atlantic Plaza Tower Tenant

  • “We as residents do not want to feel as if though we are prisoners, tagged and monitored as soon as we make a move . . . We have been continuously treated like criminals in our own homes.”

    Tasliym Francis, Atlantic Plaza Tower Tenant

  • “An extensive DVR-security camera system with approximately 175 cameras, including a state of the art facial recognition system at the front entrance, will provide safety for tenants and the public.”

    Omni New York LLC, 655 Morris Avenue

Company Profiles

Rezoning Maps

FACIAL RECOGNITION DEPLOYMENT IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLEXES

Public and low-income housing in gentrifying neighborhoods as testing grounds for facial recognition


Map of Housing Complexes

How to Research Landlord Tech

Step 1: Identify Social Media Presence

If you want to research a specific landlord tech company, the first step is to go to their website and see if they have any social media accounts. Sometimes, these can be found in the footer of the website, or you might want to look up “Instagram + ‘Company Name’” on a search engine and see what comes up. If the company has an Instagram account, read a few posts and see if there is any information about specific locations (cities, neighborhoods, buildings) that could locate where their technology is being deployed.

Step 3: Export and Clean Data

Upload the data you scraped into Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, LibreOffice, or other spreadsheet software of your choice. Read through your data and clean up the spreadsheet to only keep information that you are interested in. This is a sample spreadsheet with data scraped from the Instagram account of virtual doorman company Carson (@carson.live). Each row represents a different Instagram post from Carson. Each column contains a different set of information scraped from the post (ex: description, location, photo, hashtags, etc).

Step 4: Additional Data Sources

Once you have a clean spreadsheet with scraped social media data, you may want to add more information based on how you’d like to use it. For example: If you want to visualize your data by mapping it, you will need to “geocode” it. That means, for any post with a specific location (ex: New York City, NY or “45 Landlord Avenue, Brooklyn NY”), you will need a “latitude” and a “longitude” to place it on a map. You can geocode points individually by inputting addresses into LatLong.Net, or using a batch geocoder like Batch Geocoder for Journalists. In your spreadsheet, you would need to add a column for latitude, and a column for longitude. If you want to research the landlord of a specific building where tech has been deployed, you could add a column in your spreadsheet for “ownership” and look it up. In New York City, JustFix NYC’s WhoOwnsWhat is a great tool to find out who owns a specific building. In San Francisco, the AntiEviction Mapping Project will be releasing a similar tool, EvictorBook, to help tenants research their landlords.

Step 2: Scrape Data

Once you have identified one or more companies whose social media accounts could be fruitful as a data source, you are going to need to “scrape” the data — in other words, find a way to bulk download the information they have posted on their social media page. Alternatively, you could do it manually and write down the information contained in each post into a spreadsheet — but that takes a long time. There are many ways to scrape data. One platform is Octoparse,191 a web scraping tool that comes with a handful of free templates. Templates are great if you do not have software engineering experience — they allow you to scrape data without writing your own code. One shortcoming of Octoparse however, is that the free version only lets you scrape up to 8,000 hours (roughly 300 days) of social media posts —so you won’t be able to scrape the entire company’s social media account. Alternatively, if you have some coding experience, you could look for a code repository that guides you through the steps involved in data scraping. For example, the following GitHub repository guides you through using a data scraper built with Python: https://github.com/arc298/instagram-scraper

Step 5: Ground Truthing

Digital data and maps often include blindpots, misrepresentations, and inaccuracies. They also tend to obscure on-the-ground observations and present a top-down view, gazing down on our cities. If you are able to, it could be fruitful to “ground-truth” the data you have found through web scraping. Find a data point near you, in your neighborhood for example, and go check out the building. Do you see a new video intercom installed in the entrance way, or any other signs of landlord tech? If you feel comfortable, take a picture to show what you find, and contribute it to our growing body of crowdsourced data on Landlord Tech Watch.

Sample Foil